Queste le motivazioni della sentenza contro l'affissione del Crorefisso nelle aule delle scuole italiane
Decision of the Court
The presence of the crucifix – which it was impossible not to notice in the classrooms – could easily be interpreted by pupils of all ages as a religious sign and they would feel that they were being educated in a school environment bearing the stamp of a given religion.This could be encouraging for religious pupils, but also disturbing for pupils who practised other religions or were atheists, particularly if they belonged to religious minorities
Vabbè questo te lo posso concedere via ...proprio perchè oggi voglio essere di larghe vedute!!
The freedom not to believe in any religion (inherent in the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Convention) was not limited to the absence of religious services or religious education: it extended to practices and symbols which expressed a belief, a religion or atheism.
Si è vero..per l'amor del cielo, ma se io sono un bambino che non sa niente del crocefisso e nessuno mi racconta niente a scuola come faccio ad essere influenzato e/o condizionato solo da un simbolo? Ma ora ecco il delirio...
This freedom deserved particular protection if it was the State which expressed a belief and the individual was placed in a situation which he or she could not avoid, or could do so only through a disproportionate effort and sacrifice.
Cosa non possono evitare i bimbi atei o che professano altri credi??? e se lo fanno che prezzo pagano?? ma andiamo??? giù le parrucche e venite in una scuola italiana a dare un'occhiata!!!
The State was to refrain from imposing beliefs in premises where individuals were dependent on it. In particular, it was required to observe confessional neutrality in the context of public education, where attending classes was compulsory irrespective of religion, and where the aim should be to foster critical thinking in pupils.
Ma cosa impone lo Stato??? Ma se nessuno se lo caga quel simbolo!!! ( ahi noi)
The Court was unable to grasp how the display, in classrooms in State schools, of a symbol that could reasonably be associated with Catholicism (the majority religion in Italy) could serve the educational pluralism that was essential to the preservation of a “democratic society” as that was conceived by the Convention, a pluralism that was recognised by the Italian Constitutional Court.
Ma non è che invece di chiedersi come si aiuta il pluralismo delle fedi sarebbe stato meglio porsi il problema se qualcosa nelle scuole italiane lo ostacola e se questo qualcosa può essere solo lontanamente ricondotto alla presenza del Gesù sui muri??
The compulsory display of a symbol of a given confession in premises used by the public authorities, and especially in classrooms, thus restricted the right of parents to educate their children in conformity with their convictions, and the right of children to believe or not to believe.
Ma che dicono?? I genitori facciano cosa vogliono della fede dei propri figli, con o senza il crocefisso sui muri!!!
